hitler hitler
hitler hitler gay
hitler hitler gay
hitler hitler hitler gay

fabricar v tr borghisar | fon [buɾɣiˈza] (arm, min, cal, gab), [boɾɣiˈa] (gar), [boɾɣiˈza] (mal, sar, mai, tav, zar), [boɾɣiˈzaɾ] (mau). | etim Del sdn. borgisari, del perà bōrgisari, pres del sardè bourgizon “fàbrica, factoria, taller que produeix a l’engròs”; rel. amb el meg. thaburkisari “manufacturar industriosament” (meg. dhabur– “obra industriosa, cosa manufacturada”); mireu fàbrica. | usos Fig Concebre, idear: borghisar aucetes “fabricar idees”, borghisar marles “fabricar maldats”, etc. | mireu també fer, manufacturar, produir.

…¿qué?

This is a footnote test.1 It2 notes foots.+This is a plus note. It only shows in context.
The surface of the Earth is a giant whale.

1

Heh+heh1 heh heh

I can see no difference between plus notes and just doing+something like this.

It also looks ugly.

this +doesn't work very well

Okay. I'll work on it. Maybe it'll end up being more like an abbr tag, where whole words can be highlighted rather than just embedding notes.

It's a great idea (I'm a serial abuser of parentheses [I pretty much use them in preference to rearranging a sentence so it can use commas or semicolons; not ideal, but it's how I think], it's really bad sometimes), which given a little work could be incredibly neat and useful1.

quoting Nessari:

I love footnotes in books; still getting used to the idea of them on webpages.

This book on narrative theory I have acquires more footnotes with every edition. Some of them stretch over the bottom halves of several pages. It is fucking terrible and disruptive. Especially when there's relevant content in the footnotes.1

I once had to do a review of a book that was thick as hell. I thought I wouldn't finish it in time but, to my joy, it was stuffed with footnotes that covered a 50% of the page (in some extreme cases, and they weren't uncommon, the footnotes covered 4/5 parts of the page). Most of the information in the footnotes wasn't really important, so I diagonal-read it.

Let's +see if +this +works as intended.

What +if I +do this?

Fixed both. +go+forth+and+be+insufferable

Wait, are footnotes1[/note][/note] possible?

quoting Jipí:

Wait, are footnotes[note]in footnotes[note]in footnotes[note]in even more footnotes[/note][/note][/note] possible?

Awww I was going to test that last night, but forgot…I wanted to into recursive

Make this a thing!

+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks

+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks

+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks+cocks

+

+

cocks

+

+

test