Results
Previous
Next
Bugs, Requests, and Changes (2015-08-04 20:52:37) :
Okay... looks like there may have been a permissions error in the last migration that was preventing universe image portfolio creation. Hopefully fixed now.
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2015-08-04 20:52:37.
Vokram Speaks! (2015-07-30 04:55:03) :
Guess who's back?
<Batrachos> Are there any good heart for women who mounted on his beetle as if on their lord am only throwing up my arse for ourselves in watching a damned long ago at his furious howling just as cleonymus on the wheel may not I was made for certain they awoke at least the women that ever hungry he must die for wine of bleating ewes of a sonsie open-looking.
<Opticon> Rhetorica: The georgian ductus you provided conspicuously includes a mediaeval-st...
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2015-07-30 04:56:45.
happiness thread (2015-06-19 16:11:53) :
[i]what is it with SCA developers who have trouble with metathesis gah[/i]
I'm really glad to hear you're using a sophisticated featural vector approach. My next big bio project is going to be something very analogous; I started work on it a couple of years ago but scrapped it because I realised I was implementing the actual alignment procedure in an asinine way.
A neat trick I discovered which might help handling metathesis: convert your feature vectors to floating point (if t...
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2015-06-19 16:11:53.
happiness thread (2015-06-16 06:07:07) :
[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLAST_%28protocol%29]This, right?[/url] I actually had a boxed copy of it (okay—just the manuals and box) that I found at a junk shop. No idea where it is now.
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2015-06-16 06:07:07.
Test thread! (2015-06-15 17:01:05) :
No; it was added to the forums as a last line of defence against layout-breaking huge pictures.
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2015-06-15 17:01:05.
happiness thread (2015-06-15 16:56:13) :
That is definitely what I was afraid of. Unless you added scores for linguistically-relevant transformations like metathesis and rank misalignments according to how many steps of sound change are required to go from one to the other (and weight them according to frequency.) Did you do any of that, or is it basically just Levenshtein edit distance?
"Quick-and-dirty" approaches are a major problem in bioinformatics, mostly outside of Europe. You end up with tools and pipelines that work f...
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2015-06-15 16:59:10.
happiness thread (2015-06-11 20:49:40) :
[quote Morrígan, Marquise]They depict the way that model parameters impact the performance of the algorithm vs some human-aligned data. Basically all of that involves sequence alignment stuff, and weight coefficients for my feature model.
I was thinking I could make a thread about this over in Terra Firma[/quote]
Yes, please do. I need to know what sequences you're aligning so I can rant drunkenly about how it's a complete farce. Except without alcohol.
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2015-06-11 20:49:54.
Previous
Next
1292 results.
New Search