Results
Previous
Next
Bugs and missing features (2014-02-14 12:28:04) :
[quote Jipí][quote Rhetorica]User-to-user private messaging system implemented. See [#60810|news post].[/quote]
I think the user list shouldn't distinguish between uppercase first letters and lowercase ones?[/quote]
Fixed!
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-02-14 12:28:04.
Bugs and missing features (2014-02-14 06:11:59) :
[quote Rhetorica]User-to-user private messaging system implemented. See [#60810|news post].[/quote]
I think the user list shouldn't distinguish between uppercase first letters and lowercase ones?
owned by Jipí, last edited 2014-02-14 06:11:59.
Reduplication issues in my conlang (crosspost from blog) (2014-02-13 16:33:14) :
Late to the party here, but I would say: go for it. There is no reason why nouniness of adjectives would prevent the two word classes from working in different ways. For example big > bigger, but kill > killer; -er goes for both comparatives on adjectives and agentive nominalizations on verbs. This sort of thing happens in nature, and it's normal and common for linguists to use such differences as tests for a root's default syntactic category.
owned by Radius, last edited 2014-02-13 16:33:14.
Speak in Your Premodern Conlang Thread (2014-02-06 17:09:51) :
(As I cannot read the English comment in character...)
[b]Ća nasåt we paattåt Keińodedi nei Ereladi tebusapa?[/b]
[g what]tɕa[/g] [g human.NOM-]nas[/g][g NOM.PL]ɒt[/g] [g or.INCL]wɛ[/g] [g god.NOM-]pɑːtː[/g][g NOM.PL]ɒt[/g] [g Kāiŋoðe-]kɛi̯ɲɔðɛ[/g][g ACC.SG]ði[/g] [g and]nɛi̯[/g] [g Erĕl-]ɛrɛl[/g][g ACC.SG]aði[/g] [g be-]tɛ[/g][g ACC.3PL.A-]βu[/g][g NOM.3PL.A=]sa[/g][g INT]pa[/g]
What humans or gods are Kāiŋoðe and Erĕl?
owned by Travis B., last edited 2014-02-12 19:40:41.
Speak in Your Premodern Conlang Thread (2014-02-12 17:37:59) :
[gb][g 3-NOM-F.PL]Lifasa[/g] [g with]íé[/g] [g DEF.F.SG]a[/g] [g sun-F.SG]Sabta[/g] [g also]núeú[/g] [g be-PRS]vis[/g] [g GNO]kai[/g] [g Q]dhí?[/g][/gb]
Are the girls also associated with the sun?
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-02-12 17:37:59.
Speak in Your Conlang Thread (2014-02-12 17:33:26) :
[gb][g but]Ekla[/g] [g now-F.SG.T_LOC]otalata,[/g] [g make_perfect-PASS.3.SG.PRS]ézelhizhé![/g] [g thus]Des[/g] [g justify-2.SG.PAST]zanlekíúbedré,[/g] [g yes]zú.[/g][/gb]
But now it's perfect! Thus you were justified, yes.
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-02-12 17:33:26.
Forumworld (2014-02-12 16:10:02) :
This name popped into my head this morning: [i]Maldisi, Maldisa[/i], for the/a mountain people(s) and/or tribe. Not sure why, but it sounds quite right.
More on the actual current topic, do we want to build races (I'm just going to run with that as a catch-all term) from scratch, as it were, or copy existing earth types with a tweak or two?
owned by Nessari, last edited 2014-02-12 16:14:30.
Test thread! (2014-02-12 10:14:51) :
[quote Rhetorica]:meow:[/quote]
[image: http://static3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100217032652/unanything/images/f/f9/Dramatic-Prairie-Dog.gif]
owned by Nessari, last edited 2014-02-12 10:14:51.
Forumworld (2014-02-12 00:58:00) :
Personally I see the most potential for two distinct ethnicities—a population native to the mountains to the north, and maybe a plains or forest-dwelling folk coming up from the south or east.
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-02-12 00:58:00.
Forumworld (2014-02-11 20:36:03) :
I was just thinking about that this morning myself. How about first, do we want this locus to be homogenous, split two ways, or a 3 or more melting pot?
owned by Nessari, last edited 2014-02-11 20:36:03.
Previous
Next
8329 results.
New Search