quoting Rhetorica:It's kind of crazy how you jumped straight into syntax—were you ever going to give us morphology?
quoting Rhetorica:the way your interrogative syntax is presented reminds me of how the punctuation mark "¿" was invented: to make it more obvious that a sentence was a question before you got to the end of it because the grammar gave no clues. (And this apparently required rearranging the sentence's meaning? I don't know enough about Spanish to comment. Maybe someone else can.) You might want to consider a similar way of marking questions, since I could see some examples causing that sort of trouble.
quoting Matrix:quoting Rhetorica:It's kind of crazy how you jumped straight into syntax—were you ever going to give us morphology?
I was, but I wasn't sure how to do it so as to present new information - all the affixes and adpositions are listed in the dictionary.
quoting kodé:Or is it completely productive, like you could say something like "I ate the apples to lose weight" — 'weight' 'apples' 'I' 'lose' 'ate'?
quoting kodé:It's very unnatlangy to change the word order in questions across the board: usually there's sensitivity to a question word or wh-word. Think of what you'd do in sentences like "What did the dog eat?" with object wh-words. You could have SOV order in yes/no questions with an extra question particle, and put the wh-word at the front of the sentence in wh-questions.
quoting Wikipedia:In a sentence, however complex, only one finite verb occurs, normally at the end, preceded if necessary by a number of gerunds.