Results
Previous Next
Basic Vocabulary for Philologists (2014-10-17 20:53:29) :
I do have the raw version of that as a spreadsheet, I'll try to find the original and post it.
I do have the raw version of that as a spreadsheet, I'll try to find the original and post it.
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-17 20:53:29.
Basic Vocabulary for Philologists (2014-10-17 20:52:33) :
Yeah, sorry, it is the verbs one.
[https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B0yPt9F6jiAbdXFWMll5UzkxTDA&usp=drive_web | I have these PDFs]
Yeah, sorry, it is the verbs one.
[https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B0yPt9F6jiAbdXFWMll5UzkxTDA&usp=drive_web | I have these PDFs]
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-17 20:52:33.
Basic Vocabulary for Philologists (2014-10-17 20:28:56) :
I have Beekes; it should be easy to use the index to build a new version of the spreadsheet. I used the Indo-Iranian dictionary too; Celtic might be based heavily on Masatovic, I've not been on that site in a while. I have a PDF of that book though.
I have Beekes; it should be easy to use the index to build a new version of the spreadsheet. I used the Indo-Iranian dictionary too; Celtic might be based heavily on Masatovic, I've not been on that site in a while. I have a PDF of that book though.
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-17 20:28:56.
happiness thread (2014-10-17 19:34:11) :
Or bi. I might be guilty of contributing to bisexual erasure here. *shame*
Not that it's really any of my business.
Or bi. I might be guilty of contributing to bisexual erasure here. *shame*
Not that it's really any of my business.
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-17 19:34:11.
Basic Vocabulary for Philologists (2014-10-17 19:30:19) :
And responded to it this morning. I think using a master index is probably the way to go, after more consideration. The only downside is if there are dupes in the old master lexicon (there are).
And responded to it this morning. I think using a master index is probably the way to go, after more consideration. The only downside is if there are dupes in the old master lexicon (there are).
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-17 19:30:19.
happiness thread (2014-10-17 18:38:15) :
I dunno, I just feel like I've seen some cool, important lesbians wearing black blazers and denim and stuff. Like, Ellen Page I guess.
If I had a side-buzz, it would work better. Either that or that's the most [i]hipster[/i] outfit I've ever worn.
I dunno, I just feel like I've seen some cool, important lesbians wearing black blazers and denim and stuff. Like, Ellen Page I guess.
If I had a side-buzz, it would work better. Either that or that's the most [i]hipster[/i] outfit I've ever worn.
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-17 18:38:15.
happiness thread (2014-10-17 17:04:16) :
I need to learn how to do more things with my hair, and get brighter fluorescent lights to use for shooting, and possible some kind of tripod mount for positioning them.
Also, I like how that all-black outfit might actually be the most lesbian outfit I've ever come up with.
I need to learn how to do more things with my hair, and get brighter fluorescent lights to use for shooting, and possible some kind of tripod mount for positioning them.
Also, I like how that all-black outfit might actually be the most lesbian outfit I've ever come up with.
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-17 17:04:16.
Kala grammar (2014-10-17 15:26:46) :
Yeah that's cool. I was actually not even thinking of something quite as detailed, but that's great way to show the morphological information.
Yeah that's cool. I was actually not even thinking of something quite as detailed, but that's great way to show the morphological information.
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-17 15:26:46.
happiness thread (2014-10-17 14:41:02) :
Ok I did it.
[i][http://wizardsnewclothes.tumblr.com/ | Among Others][/i]
Ok I did it.
[i][http://wizardsnewclothes.tumblr.com/ | Among Others][/i]
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-17 14:41:02.
happiness thread (2014-10-17 13:30:20) :
That's probably even more than just a groaner.
That's probably even more than just a groaner.
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-17 13:30:20.
happiness thread (2014-10-17 13:06:25) :
Now I have to figure out what to call it...
And no, I've never needed to deal with Debian kernel stuff.
Now I have to figure out what to call it...
And no, I've never needed to deal with Debian kernel stuff.
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-17 13:06:25.
Kala grammar (2014-10-17 13:04:00) :
Basically, just a template of where morphemes go in the verb complex, like
[table][tr]
[td][box]Past Prefix[/box][/td]
[td][box]Agent Agreement Marker[/box][/td]
[td][box]Aspect Prefix[/box][/td]
[td][box]{Tense Stem}[/box][/td]
[td][box]Modal Suffix[/box][/td]
[td][box]Patient Agreement Marker[/box][/td]
[/tr][/table]
It's kind of good way to get an overview of what things might be marked on the verb. Obviously, it's more helpful for language which ...
Basically, just a template of where morphemes go in the verb complex, like
[table][tr]
[td][box]Past Prefix[/box][/td]
[td][box]Agent Agreement Marker[/box][/td]
[td][box]Aspect Prefix[/box][/td]
[td][box]{Tense Stem}[/box][/td]
[td][box]Modal Suffix[/box][/td]
[td][box]Patient Agreement Marker[/box][/td]
[/tr][/table]
It's kind of good way to get an overview of what things might be marked on the verb. Obviously, it's more helpful for language which ...
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-17 13:04:00.
Kala grammar (2014-10-17 12:23:49) :
It looks good, I haven't seen anything else that's really unclear. I'd suggest thinking about laying out the verbs a little differently, maybe just showing a template for all of the possible morphemes in order (the verb seems moderately synthetic).
It looks good, I haven't seen anything else that's really unclear. I'd suggest thinking about laying out the verbs a little differently, maybe just showing a template for all of the possible morphemes in order (the verb seems moderately synthetic).
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-17 12:23:49.
happiness thread (2014-10-17 10:05:42) :
[image:http://33.media.tumblr.com/a4bc8bda18d220eb154269ca74023465/tumblr_ndkkxd27Sy1sl2rvto1_1280.jpg | width: 366px; height: 613px;]
Gratuitous. I need to start a fashion blog for real.
[image:http://33.media.tumblr.com/a4bc8bda18d220eb154269ca74023465/tumblr_ndkkxd27Sy1sl2rvto1_1280.jpg | width: 366px; height: 613px;]
Gratuitous. I need to start a fashion blog for real.
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-17 10:05:42.
Grrr Thread (2014-10-17 10:01:30) :
Only when they are jerks. If more of them were sweet and empathetic and well groomed, I would maybe have sex with them some times.
Only when they are jerks. If more of them were sweet and empathetic and well groomed, I would maybe have sex with them some times.
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-17 10:01:30.
Grrr Thread (2014-10-16 23:20:02) :
OH fuck, color blindness is x-linked, but the second copy prevents it from expressing (typically) in persons with 46XX karyotype. There do not seem to be any common Y-linked traits, probably by the Y chromosome is a giant piece of garbage.
OH fuck, color blindness is x-linked, but the second copy prevents it from expressing (typically) in persons with 46XX karyotype. There do not seem to be any common Y-linked traits, probably by the Y chromosome is a giant piece of garbage.
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-16 23:20:02.
Kala grammar (2014-10-16 14:09:58) :
TBH, I've never been 100% clear on the meaning of "free variation"; I always thought that meant unconditioned, but I feel that I've seen it used in a way which excluded that possibility.
After doing some quick searching, it seems that my initial impression is correct, and that it does count as allophony; that sort of basic thing is probably better to put in the inventory, since there isn't much to it. Save conditioned allophony for the allophony section itself.
TBH, I've never been 100% clear on the meaning of "free variation"; I always thought that meant unconditioned, but I feel that I've seen it used in a way which excluded that possibility.
After doing some quick searching, it seems that my initial impression is correct, and that it does count as allophony; that sort of basic thing is probably better to put in the inventory, since there isn't much to it. Save conditioned allophony for the allophony section itself.
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-16 14:09:58.
Kala grammar (2014-10-16 13:47:59) :
Yeah, I just mean that the passage could be read to suggest that <s> represents the phoneme /s/ in some positions and /ʃ/ in others, but I assume the intention is that /s/ occurs as [ʃ] in most positions but as [s] in others.
Yeah, I just mean that the passage could be read to suggest that <s> represents the phoneme /s/ in some positions and /ʃ/ in others, but I assume the intention is that /s/ occurs as [ʃ] in most positions but as [s] in others.
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-16 13:47:59.
Kala grammar (2014-10-16 13:40:29) :
[quote]Both ”s” & ”ts” are /ʃ/ and /tʃ/ respectively, unless immediately preceded or followed by one another, then ”s” is always /s/ and ”ts” is always /tʃ/.[/quote]
I presumed the second one is a typo. Also, since this is a section on allophony, it looks like the // vs [] use is wrong, unless the 'alternation' is actually based on a weird orthographic convention.
[quote]Both ”s” & ”ts” are /ʃ/ and /tʃ/ respectively, unless immediately preceded or followed by one another, then ”s” is always /s/ and ”ts” is always /tʃ/.[/quote]
I presumed the second one is a typo. Also, since this is a section on allophony, it looks like the // vs [] use is wrong, unless the 'alternation' is actually based on a weird orthographic convention.
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-16 13:40:29.
Kala grammar (2014-10-16 12:52:12) :
// instead of [] in a bunch of places
In the Allophony section, the description of [b]s[/b] and [b]ts[/b] is kind of vague. Like, [b]ts[/b] is /tʃ/ except when it's /tʃ/. Also, does [b]s[/b] become [s] when there is a /ts/ in an adjacent syllable?
// instead of [] in a bunch of places
In the Allophony section, the description of [b]s[/b] and [b]ts[/b] is kind of vague. Like, [b]ts[/b] is /tʃ/ except when it's /tʃ/. Also, does [b]s[/b] become [s] when there is a /ts/ in an adjacent syllable?
owned by Morrígan, last edited 2014-10-16 12:52:12.
Previous Next
303 results.