Results
Previous
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
Next
Test thread! (2014-09-02 13:36:08) :
Bam! Got it! :serpent:s :stick stuff to wind:shields :s
Bam! Got it! :serpent:s :stick stuff to wind:shields :s
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-09-02 13:36:53.
Test thread! (2014-09-02 10:20:38) :
stuff :st:suff :s stuff:s booo:s:s:s:s
[image:/pictures/emoticons/blue/confounded.gif|width: 300px]
[image:/pictures/emoticons/blue/confounded.gif|width: 250px]
stuff :st:suff :s stuff:s booo:s:s:s:s
[image:/pictures/emoticons/blue/confounded.gif|width: 300px]
[image:/pictures/emoticons/blue/confounded.gif|width: 250px]
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-09-02 13:35:37.
Test thread! (2014-09-02 13:14:42) :
Yes. That's the same issue. For some reason the regex pattern /\bx\b/ where x is the emoticon isn't working. (And before anyone asks, ":s" doesn't require any escaping.) I may just go quietly nuts.
Yes. That's the same issue. For some reason the regex pattern /\bx\b/ where x is the emoticon isn't working. (And before anyone asks, ":s" doesn't require any escaping.) I may just go quietly nuts.
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-09-02 13:14:42.
Test thread! (2014-09-02 12:00:19) :
Actually, I was trying to fix emoticon detection in general using :s as my test target. It appeared in [[muilyu]]'s email link and totally borked the fancy.
Actually, I was trying to fix emoticon detection in general using :s as my test target. It appeared in [[muilyu]]'s email link and totally borked the fancy.
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-09-02 12:00:19.
Revolutionary Derailment Thread for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Anthologica (2014-09-02 02:43:11) :
Also, a bit more seriously, I think I'd have to write a bit more internal documentation before an actual coup would be practical. It's not like ripping off a phpBB or something.
HOWEVER.
If you guys and gals [i]do[/i] want to elect more forum or other sorts of mods—in my honest opinion, we don't need them yet, but hey, it's always good to dream big, right?—then I'll gladly accept nominations, Westminster style. (I've been practising the little screwin'-in-a-lightbulb-wave and e...
Also, a bit more seriously, I think I'd have to write a bit more internal documentation before an actual coup would be practical. It's not like ripping off a phpBB or something.
HOWEVER.
If you guys and gals [i]do[/i] want to elect more forum or other sorts of mods—in my honest opinion, we don't need them yet, but hey, it's always good to dream big, right?—then I'll gladly accept nominations, Westminster style. (I've been practising the little screwin'-in-a-lightbulb-wave and e...
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-09-02 02:43:30.
Looking For Idioms! Please Send (a) Post! (2014-09-02 02:38:21) :
Communion. It's about communion. Or something.
Communion. It's about communion. Or something.
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-09-02 02:38:21.
Revolutionary Derailment Thread for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Anthologica :
Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-09-02 02:32:33.
Bugs, Requests, and Changes (2014-08-31 14:11:46) :
Today, they have other things.
Today, they have other things.
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-08-31 14:11:46.
Looking For Idioms! Please Send (a) Post! (2014-08-31 02:09:09) :
That seems pretty analogous to "becoming unglued" or "unhinged" perhaps? Allusions to the separation of things that were normally not separated.
That seems pretty analogous to "becoming unglued" or "unhinged" perhaps? Allusions to the separation of things that were normally not separated.
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-08-31 02:09:09.
Test thread! (2014-08-30 11:00:43) :
This... this is just some sort of therapy, right? You're not all [i]actually[/i] fourteen?
This... this is just some sort of therapy, right? You're not all [i]actually[/i] fourteen?
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-08-30 11:00:43.
Bugs, Requests, and Changes (2014-08-30 10:53:13) :
It can be both things!
It can be both things!
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-08-30 10:53:13.
Speak in Your Conlang Thread (2014-08-30 00:27:15) :
[b]Zú, [i]íowê[/i]; ze Zíbo sefri faréne eleye írélle.[/b]
Yes, [i]please[/i]; the Zeeb had enough of that.
[b]Zú, [i]íowê[/i]; ze Zíbo sefri faréne eleye írélle.[/b]
Yes, [i]please[/i]; the Zeeb had enough of that.
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-08-30 00:28:10.
Quote Thread (2014-08-30 00:23:57) :
...which, by most reckonings, requires quantum mechanics.
...which, by most reckonings, requires quantum mechanics.
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-08-30 00:23:57.
Bugs, Requests, and Changes (2014-08-30 00:22:23) :
Just [i]don't[/i].
Just [i]don't[/i].
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-08-30 00:22:23.
Test thread! (2014-08-29 15:27:47) :
No. That abomination is purely a Kantian moral dilemma.
No. That abomination is purely a Kantian moral dilemma.
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-08-29 15:28:03.
Bugs, Requests, and Changes (2014-08-29 15:14:28) :
Fairly non-trivial to implement, and [i]generally not an issue when you aren't trying to do something so heinously stupid.[/i] If someone wants to put an image in a header for [i]legitimate reasons[/i] (e.g. a custom letter), that's fine! If someone wants to put a hyperlink in a header, again for legitimate reasons (e.g. making it link off-site) then that, again, is fine.
...and if someone wants to put an H4 in a footnote with a giant image macro in it, then [i]make no mistake[/i], ther...
Fairly non-trivial to implement, and [i]generally not an issue when you aren't trying to do something so heinously stupid.[/i] If someone wants to put an image in a header for [i]legitimate reasons[/i] (e.g. a custom letter), that's fine! If someone wants to put a hyperlink in a header, again for legitimate reasons (e.g. making it link off-site) then that, again, is fine.
...and if someone wants to put an H4 in a footnote with a giant image macro in it, then [i]make no mistake[/i], ther...
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-08-29 15:14:28.
Sound Change Appliers (2014-08-29 14:33:06) :
Well, um, not to let things get [i]too[/i] out of hand, but, uh...
[image:http://recaption.com/uploads/138754fa703dd311fa.jpg|width: 200px]
Maybe?
Well, um, not to let things get [i]too[/i] out of hand, but, uh...
[image:http://recaption.com/uploads/138754fa703dd311fa.jpg|width: 200px]
Maybe?
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-08-29 14:36:02.
Absences (2014-08-29 14:14:56) :
...wait, California isn't part-and-parcel part of Cascadia? Huh. Oops. My bad. I guess that makes more sense. (Although by "stoners" and "Microsoft employees" I was trying to allude to BC and Washington respectively.)
...wait, California isn't part-and-parcel part of Cascadia? Huh. Oops. My bad. I guess that makes more sense. (Although by "stoners" and "Microsoft employees" I was trying to allude to BC and Washington respectively.)
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-08-29 14:15:16.
Sound Change Appliers (2014-08-29 14:11:17) :
Sounds good! And, actually, I have one more request, maybe; the ability to specify multiple rules files and have the outputs be saved in an interleaved format. E.g.
[code]word 1 ruleset 1
word 1 ruleset 2
word 1 ruleset 3
word 2 ruleset 1
word 2 ruleset 2
word 3 ruleset 3[/code]
... etc.
This would be greatly preferable to running the SCA a dozen times for a basic inflection profile.
A lot of times, the program may only get run with one or two w...
Sounds good! And, actually, I have one more request, maybe; the ability to specify multiple rules files and have the outputs be saved in an interleaved format. E.g.
[code]word 1 ruleset 1
word 1 ruleset 2
word 1 ruleset 3
word 2 ruleset 1
word 2 ruleset 2
word 3 ruleset 3[/code]
... etc.
This would be greatly preferable to running the SCA a dozen times for a basic inflection profile.
A lot of times, the program may only get run with one or two w...
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-08-29 14:12:49.
Sound Change Appliers (2014-08-29 14:04:10) :
Take it a step further: permit class permutation at the same time.
(C)(N) > $C2$N1
Where the index in the set N is used to look up the index in C. So if C = {p t k} and N = {m n ŋ} this would swap the place of articulation without disturbing the mode.
If you add this, then I can retire happily and not write klank at all, confident that you've got all the bases covered, and it'll just be a matter of writing a wrapper module for the HT SCA and building a front-end tha...
Take it a step further: permit class permutation at the same time.
(C)(N) > $C2$N1
Where the index in the set N is used to look up the index in C. So if C = {p t k} and N = {m n ŋ} this would swap the place of articulation without disturbing the mode.
If you add this, then I can retire happily and not write klank at all, confident that you've got all the bases covered, and it'll just be a matter of writing a wrapper module for the HT SCA and building a front-end tha...
owned by Rhetorica, last edited 2014-08-29 14:04:10.
Previous
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
Next1292 results.